As I write there is a looming battle between Congress and President Bush over reauthorization of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP. The program ends at the end of the month unless it is reauthorized. SCHIP provides health insurance to children in families with too much income to qualify for Medicaid but too poor to afford healthcare. It is a complicated question, well reviewed in a recent New England Journal of Medicine article here. The controversy boils down to what we think the government’s role should be in providing health care to children. Most support helping the truly poor, those below the federal poverty threshold of an income of $20,650 for a family of four, but many balk at giving public money to families making as much as twice that. Another issue is that the SCHIP reauthorization bill, as with many bills, was quickly laden with extraneous add-ons.
I support SCHIP because, without it, children in families slightly above the poverty line suffer. When these children get seriously ill they will end up in PICUs like mine anyway, and if they have no insurance the government usually ends up with the bill. If these children had insurance for preventative care, they may well have not needed the expensive PICU in the first place. I would much rather see a comprehensive overhaul of our medical system, but I despair of that ever happening until the inevitable time in the future when things really do fall apart. Meanwhile SHCIP is a band-aid, but I think it is a needed band-aid.
Addendum: Here is an update–it looks as if some compromise will pass. Whether the president will sign it is another matter, of course.
Another addendum: Here is another update–a compromise passed both houses. It’s still unclear if the president will sign it.
Update: President Bush has vetoed the bill. It is unclear at this point if Congress will have sufficient votes to override the veto, but most expect that the Democrats will try to do this. They will need to attract Republicans to do so.
Still another reason your insurance premiums go up: cost-shifting from public to private payers is getting worse and worse
10/24/2011 • A recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine makes an interesting contrast between the approaches public and private health plans have taken in controlling costs. It points out how governmental health programs -- ...more
09/11/2012 • Even people who do not follow the controversy about healthcare funding are aware of the fundamental root of the problem: inflation in healthcare costs has long exceeded inflation of everything else in the economy. This ...more
Leave a Reply
04/23/2015 • One of the goals of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) was to increase access to primary care physicians. The notion is that if people have insurance it would be easier for them to get ...more
04/16/2015 • The CHIP program (Children's Health Insurance Program) has just been reauthorized by Congress. This is a program that provides health insurance for children of lower income families who still make too much income to qualify ...more
11/12/2014 • Everyone wants to be sure their physician is competent and appropriately trained. The way this is done is through credentialing. A new applicant for privileges to practice at a hospital or other healthcare facility fills ...more
11/19/2012 • There is one aspect of our relentlessly rising healthcare costs that seems particularly out of control -- administrative costs. An interesting recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine provides some sobering details. Every physician ...more